<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawco.com &#187; PepsiCo Judgment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lawco.com/tag/pepsico-judgment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lawco.com</link>
	<description>World and Legal News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 21:26:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Court No Show Costs PepsiCo $1.26 Billion</title>
		<link>http://www.lawco.com/204/court-no-show-costs-pepsico-1-26-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lawco.com/204/court-no-show-costs-pepsico-1-26-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lawco Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PepsiCo Judgment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lawco.com/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A default judgment award of 1.26 Billion was handed down on Sept. 30 by a Wisconsin state court in a case alleging that PepsiCo stole the idea to bottle and sell purified water from two Wisconsin men. PepsiCo filed motions to vacate the order and dismiss the claims on Oct. 13, saying it wasn&#8217;t even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A default judgment award of 1.26 Billion was handed down on Sept. 30 by a Wisconsin state court in a case alleging that PepsiCo stole the idea to bottle and sell purified water from two Wisconsin men. PepsiCo filed motions to vacate the order and dismiss the claims on Oct. 13, saying it wasn&#8217;t even aware of the lawsuit until Oct. 6.</p>
<div id="attachment_208" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 485px"><img class="size-full wp-image-208" title="GYI0000537595.jpg" src="http://www.lawco.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/aquafina.jpg" alt="Admintrator mistake costs PepsiCo $1.26 Billion default judgment" width="475" height="318" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Administrator mistake costs PepsiCo $1.26 Billion in default judgment</p></div>
<p>Charles Joyce and James Voigt sued PepsiCo in April plus two of its distributors, alleging they had misappropriated trade secrets from confidential discussions the plaintiffs had with the distributors in 1981 about selling purified water. The information was illicitly passed to PepsiCo, which used it to develop and sell Aquafina bottled water, the plaintiffs allege in the case filed in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County before Judge Jacqueline Erwin.<br />
&#8230; <span id="more-204"></span></p>
<p>In court documents, PepsiCo argues it was improperly served with the Wisconsin lawsuit in North Carolina, but also asks the court to excuse the corporate bureaucracy that buried a legal document for weeks. While plaintiffs say they served the lawsuit in June on PepsiCo&#8217;s registered agent in North Carolina, where the company is incorporated, PepsiCo says its law department at the company&#8217;s Purchase, N.Y.-based headquarters was not notified until September.</p>
<p>&#8220;The bottom line is there was a defect in the process for us, but also for&#8221; the plaintiffs, said PepsiCo spokesman Joe Jacuzzi, who called the case &#8220;highly dubious.&#8221;</p>
<p>In seeking to dismiss the case, PepsiCo argues that the statute of limitations should preclude the lawsuit, brought 15 years after the company started selling Aquafina and more than two decades after the alleged confidential talks. Moreover, &#8220;the $1.26 billion judgment that has been entered is unprecedented in size and justice requires that PepsiCo have a chance to defend itself,&#8221; the company said.</p>
<p>The lead plaintiffs <a title="find a lawyer" href="http://www.locatealawyer.com/" target="_blank">lawyer</a>, David Van Dyke of Chicago-based Cassiday Schade, said Wisconsin courts have been &#8220;pretty clear that they don&#8217;t like&#8221; vacating default judgments. &#8220;There is a possibly that a judge may say we&#8217;re going to litigate the damages aspect of it,&#8221; Van Dyke said. <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Price-to-PepsiCo-for-Not-law-3214509113.html?x=0&amp;.v=1" target="_blank">Read full story</a></p>

<div class="sociable">
<div class="sociable_tagline">
<strong>Share and Enjoy:</strong>
</div>
<ul>
	<li class="sociablefirst"><a rel="nofollow"  target="_blank" href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawco.com%2F204%2Fcourt-no-show-costs-pepsico-1-26-billion%2F&amp;title=Court%20No%20Show%20Costs%20PepsiCo%20%241.26%20Billion%20&amp;bodytext=A%20default%20judgment%20award%20of%201.26%20Billion%20was%20handed%20down%20on%20Sept.%2030%20by%20a%20Wisconsin%20state%20court%20in%20a%20case%20alleging%20that%20PepsiCo%20stole%20the%20idea%20to%20bottle%20and%20sell%20purified%20water%20from%20two%20Wisconsin%20men.%20PepsiCo%20filed%20motions%20to%20vacate%20the%20order%20and%20dis" title="Digg"><img src="http://www.lawco.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/digg.png" title="Digg" alt="Digg" class="sociable-hovers" /></a></li>
	<li><a rel="nofollow"  target="_blank" href="http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawco.com%2F204%2Fcourt-no-show-costs-pepsico-1-26-billion%2F&amp;t=Court%20No%20Show%20Costs%20PepsiCo%20%241.26%20Billion%20" title="Facebook"><img src="http://www.lawco.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/facebook.png" title="Facebook" alt="Facebook" class="sociable-hovers" /></a></li>
	<li><a rel="nofollow"  target="_blank" href="http://www.propeller.com/submit/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawco.com%2F204%2Fcourt-no-show-costs-pepsico-1-26-billion%2F" title="Propeller"><img src="http://www.lawco.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/propeller.png" title="Propeller" alt="Propeller" class="sociable-hovers" /></a></li>
	<li><a rel="nofollow"  target="_blank" href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawco.com%2F204%2Fcourt-no-show-costs-pepsico-1-26-billion%2F&amp;title=Court%20No%20Show%20Costs%20PepsiCo%20%241.26%20Billion%20" title="Reddit"><img src="http://www.lawco.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/reddit.png" title="Reddit" alt="Reddit" class="sociable-hovers" /></a></li>
	<li><a rel="nofollow"  target="_blank" href="http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawco.com%2F204%2Fcourt-no-show-costs-pepsico-1-26-billion%2F&amp;title=Court%20No%20Show%20Costs%20PepsiCo%20%241.26%20Billion%20" title="StumbleUpon"><img src="http://www.lawco.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/stumbleupon.png" title="StumbleUpon" alt="StumbleUpon" class="sociable-hovers" /></a></li>
	<li><a rel="nofollow"  target="_blank" href="http://technorati.com/faves?add=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawco.com%2F204%2Fcourt-no-show-costs-pepsico-1-26-billion%2F" title="Technorati"><img src="http://www.lawco.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/technorati.png" title="Technorati" alt="Technorati" class="sociable-hovers" /></a></li>
	<li><a rel="nofollow"  target="_blank" href="http://twitter.com/home?status=Court%20No%20Show%20Costs%20PepsiCo%20%241.26%20Billion%20%20-%20http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawco.com%2F204%2Fcourt-no-show-costs-pepsico-1-26-billion%2F" title="Twitter"><img src="http://www.lawco.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/twitter.png" title="Twitter" alt="Twitter" class="sociable-hovers" /></a></li>
	<li><a rel="nofollow"  target="_blank" href="http://buzz.yahoo.com/submit/?submitUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawco.com%2F204%2Fcourt-no-show-costs-pepsico-1-26-billion%2F&amp;submitHeadline=Court%20No%20Show%20Costs%20PepsiCo%20%241.26%20Billion%20&amp;submitSummary=A%20default%20judgment%20award%20of%201.26%20Billion%20was%20handed%20down%20on%20Sept.%2030%20by%20a%20Wisconsin%20state%20court%20in%20a%20case%20alleging%20that%20PepsiCo%20stole%20the%20idea%20to%20bottle%20and%20sell%20purified%20water%20from%20two%20Wisconsin%20men.%20PepsiCo%20filed%20motions%20to%20vacate%20the%20order%20and%20dis&amp;submitCategory=science&amp;submitAssetType=text" title="Yahoo! Buzz"><img src="http://www.lawco.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/yahoobuzz.png" title="Yahoo! Buzz" alt="Yahoo! Buzz" class="sociable-hovers" /></a></li>
	<li class="sociablelast"><a rel="nofollow"  target="_blank" href="http://www.friendfeed.com/share?title=Court%20No%20Show%20Costs%20PepsiCo%20%241.26%20Billion%20&amp;link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.lawco.com%2F204%2Fcourt-no-show-costs-pepsico-1-26-billion%2F" title="FriendFeed"><img src="http://www.lawco.com/wp-content/plugins/sociable/images/friendfeed.png" title="FriendFeed" alt="FriendFeed" class="sociable-hovers" /></a></li>
</ul>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lawco.com/204/court-no-show-costs-pepsico-1-26-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
